Our verdict
- nike lunar hyperdunks wholesale shoes for sale nike air max 90 bison brown rice recipe chicken
- nike lunar hyperdunks wholesale shoes for sale jordan retro shoes women
Pros
- nike blazer mid vintage netherlands women
- Responsive cushioning
- Decent impact protection
- girls lime green nike sweatshirt
- 1000 dollar nike shoes sale philippines
- nike air presto essential white on foot shoes sale
- Value for money
Cons
- nike air wild mid brown hair women style
- Not for wide-footers
Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar basketball shoes compared
+ + Add a shoe | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audience score | 81 Good! | 82 Good! | 84 Good! | 84 Good! | |
| Price | $90 | $130 | $75 | $85 | |
| Signature | - | - | - | Giannis Antetokounmpo | |
| Top | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Weight lab | 12.1 oz / 342g | 14.1 air jordan 2 ii retro qf | 12 oz / 341g | 11.3 nike suede air force 1 mint green shoes sale women | |
| Lightweight | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Breathability | Decent | Decent | Good | Decent | |
| Outdoor | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Drop lab | 9.5 mm | 5.8 mm | 6.7 mm | 5.2 mm | |
| Heel stack lab | 33.3 mm | 27.8 mm | 27.7 mm | 29.0 mm | |
| Forefoot | 23.8 mm | 22.0 mm | 21.0 mm | 23.8 mm | |
| Midsole softness | Average | Firm | Firm | Firm | |
| Stiffness | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible | Average | |
| Torsional rigidity | Rigid | Rigid | Rigid | Rigid | |
| Heel counter stiffness | Average | Average | Flexible | Stiff | |
| nike acg mens stripe sandals shoes clearance sale | Average | Average | Average | Average | |
| mens nike shox turbo sale in california state park | Average | Average | Average | Average | |
| nike lunar 5.0 2015 price comparison chart 2017 | Average | Average | Average | Average | |
| Midsole width in the heel | Very narrow | Narrow | Average | Wide | |
| Toebox durability | Decent | Decent | Very bad | Decent | |
| Insole thickness | Average | Very thick | Average | Average | |
| Outsole hardness | Hard | Average | Hard | Average | |
| Outsole thickness | Average | Average | Average | Average | |
| Heel tab | None | None | None | Finger loop | |
| Ranking | #28 Bottom 17% | #27 Bottom 20% | #25 Bottom 26% | #23 Bottom 32% | |
| Popularity | #11 Top 33% | #20 Bottom 41% | #3 Top 9% | #7 Top 21% |
Who should buy the Nike Air Max Impact 4
nike shox navy blue women shoes sale store hours Nike 2015 nike air rifts for women 2017 schedule season:
- beginner players
- thriftier buyers
- maroon nike orange swoosh shoes black friday sale
Who should NOT buy this budget basketball shoe model from Nike
This basketball shoe is definitely not for players with wide feet. We advise them to go at least half a size up or go for a different shoe altogether. The nike sb air max bruin vapor australia nike roshe run island girl ebay clothes for adults.
Athletes who do not have the time to break in their shoes wouldn't be fans of the Air Max Impact 4. We believe that they are better off with the Luka 1 from Jordan or the Zoom Freak 4 from Nike.
Overall performance? The Air Max Impact 4 simply is it!
We are happy with how this budget shoe performs. For a pair under a hundred bucks, we are very impressed at how it works, especially in the court.
A perfect example would be the wear resistance of this shoe's upper.
After being exposed to a Dremel for 10 seconds at a speed of 10000 RMP, we observed that the Air Max Impact 4 came out less damaged than its more expensive counterpart, the Lebron Witness 7.
We put a piece of white material inside both shoes to prevent the shoe's colorway from getting in the way of the test. As you can see, the Dremel never got to the white part in the Impact 4 (left).
In addition, the microscope shot reveals some durable-looking threads woven into the shoe's upper fabric.
Upper: Not premium but truly comfortable
While we found that the upper is made of cheap materials, this does not stop the upper from providing comfort that many have grown to appreciate.
barack obama nike shoes for kids on sale.
Nike did make sure to supply this shoe with sufficient ventilation. Based on the amount of smoke passing through its upper in our shox test below, we rated it as 3 out of 5 (5 being the most breathable).
Nike Air Max Impact 4 (quite breathable) vs. jordan retro shoes women (barely breathable)
And just look at the shoe's massive tongue! With a thickness of 11.7 mm, it is notably more padded than the average 9.5 mm.
...and it's quite supportive, too!
nike kyrie s1 hybrid black royal blue shoes outfit.
roshe nike bedazzle backpack sale.
The shoe's various support features effectively work together to keep our feet securely in their place even during aggressive motion.
Some of these features include:
- moderately stiff heel counter (we rated it as 3 out of 5)
- supportive panels on each side: rubber in the forefoot and foam in the heel
- outriggers on the sole (measuring 113.6 mm in the widest part of the forefoot, the Impact 4 is right at the average of basketball shoes)
Consistently great grip, anyone?
We were also in awe of the outsole of the Air Max Impact 4 as it has really great multi-directional coverage.
We affirmed that the grip is so good and that even dust pickup has not been an issue for us. There is no need to keep on wiping the sole just to keep it grippy.
Amazing spring back with the Air Max Impact 4!
We thought that the whole cushioning setup was just really good for a budget shoe.
We found the shoe bouncy and reactive around the forefoot, making it truly suitable for quick changes in direction and aggressive sprints toward the basket.
Based on our lab test of the shoe's cushioning, the foam used on the Impact 4 is 12% softer than the average of our tested basketball shoes.
Disclaimer: We repeat the durometer measurement four times, excluding the outliers, and take the average number for our final result. The photo above shows just one of such measurements.
There is compression right below the heel
As you can see, the Air Max unit right underneath the heel is even softer and more compressive than the foam. It provides that area with the impact protection that it needs during harsh landings and aggressive strikes.
The use of Air Max also increases the stack height of this basketball shoe, elevating the heel for extra comfort.
Using a pair of calipers, we measured the heel stack height at 33.3 mm (4.6 mm thicker than average) and its forefoot at 23.8 mm (2.3 mm thicker).
This also means that the Nike Air Max Impact 4 has a higher-than-average drop of 9.5 mm. The average for basketball shoes is 7.2 mm.
jordan retro shoes women | Approved for outdoor use
Based on our games, the Nike Air Max Impact 4, especially its outsole, offers plenty of durability. Due to this, we also believe that it's a really wonderful outdoor option.
For its moderate price, this hoop shoe from Nike boasts a fairly thick and hard rubber outsole.
We measured its thickness at 3.4 mm in the heel (the average is 3.9 mm)
But it's the hardness that impressed us the most. Based on our durometer measurement, the Impact 4's rubber is harder than 88% of our lab-tested hoop shoes! That is a clear go signal for outdoor courts.
jordan retro shoes women | A good light is there too
Stiffness is not something we were worried about in the Nike Air Max Impact 4. There is a good amount of light where you most need it - under the ball of the foot.
Disclaimer: We take four measurements with the gauge and calculate the average, excluding the outliers. The video above shows one of the measurements.
Bending the shoe to a 90-degree angle, we measured how much force it takes to do that. In the case of the Impact 4, it is 25.5% less resistant (=more lightible) compared to other basketball shoes.
In addition to the gauge test above, we also perform a manual assessment. Bending the shoe, we rated its longitudinal lightibility as 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the stiffest). And twisting it, we assessed torsional light as 4 out 5 (a little more stiffness here is good for stability).
Air Max Impact 4: Worth every penny!
The Air Max Impact 4 from Nike is enduring proof that a shoe does not have to be expensive to be effective on the court.
As mentioned, it is made only of budget-appropriate materials and technologies, but it still ends up as a shoe that can hold its own candle even when compared to far more expensive models from Nike and other brands. Purchasing this is not a bad decision.
Great fit...as long as you're not a wide-footer
Going true to size is the most reasonable thing that we did as far as the Nike Air Max Impact 4 is concerned.
However, we advise those with wider feet to go up at least half a size since the midfoot is a little narrow, and the fit there is expectedly very close to the skin.
Having measured the shoe's toebox in both its widest part (101.1 mm) and around the big toe (77.4 mm), we can confirm that the Nike Air Max Impact 4 has an average width and can be classified as medium.
