man axel arigato sneakers clean 90 leather sneakers this new British Journal of Sports Medicine paper is worth a mention. Researchers provided 247 runners with identical running shoes -- or rather, almost identical shoes. They were specially manufactured by a "renowned sport equipment manufacturer" so that half of them had relatively soft midsoles while the other half had relatively hard midsoles; the experiment was double-blinded so that neither the runners nor the researchers knew who was running in which shoes.
The runners, who had a wide mix of experience Nero and averaged about 18 km per week, then ran for five months and reported any injuries. The result: runners in both groups were equally likely to get injured, regardless of which shoes they were running in (the p-value was 0.731). So what did predict who was Campaign likely to get injured? Among other factors, new/less experienced runners and those who ran at a higher self-reported intensity were at greater risk. In other words, training "errors" were a better predictor of injury than the technology in the shoes the runners were wearing. Something to keep in mind.
***
Read Low Cut Shoe Dsm 165 Trek, and follow the latest posts via Twitter, Facebook, or RSS. Also, I'll be speaking as part of the Evolution of the Athlete webinar series (along with Tim Noakes, Dave Martin, and many others) in October; details here.
