Our verdict
- Our top pick in best tennis shoes
- Our top pick in asics sprinter tight
Pros
- Asics Metaspeed Running Shoes
- zapatillas de running ASICS mujer entrenamiento talla 39.5 verdes
- Asics Race Seamless Kurzarm T-Shirt
- zapatillas de running ASICS constitución media talla 35
- Lots of impact protection
- Asics Sakura Aop Леггинсы
- zapatillas de running ASICS de material reciclado talla 40.5
Cons
- Lacks breathability
- Upper is not so abrasion-resistant
ASICS GT 2000 8 Lite Show Pure Silver Black Pure Silver | Audience verdict
Comparison
The most similar tennis shoes compared
Who should buy
asics gel kayano trainer knit mt new colorways:
- you are a beginner/occasional tennis player
- you need a high level of support and stability
- you want a budget-friendly shoe that doesn't skimp on outsole durability
Who should NOT buy
If you are a toe dragger through and through, the Challenger 14 most likely won't last long enough for you. While it looks tough, the shoe's synthetic upper lacks the abrasion resistance we've seen in shoes like the Кроссовки кроссы asics and the ASICS Court FF 3.
Another reason to look elsewhere is if you value breathability in your tennis footwear. We recommend looking into the Asics gel-nimbus 23 platinum grey white women running sports shoes 1012b132-020 Продам кросівки asics gel venture 8.
Breathability
Let's be clear, the Challenger 14's synthetic upper is one of the thickest we've seen on a tennis shoe! So, ventilation is only allowed through the mesh tongue and a few perforations on the toebox.
This is easily illustrated in our proprietary breathability test. Filling the shoe's upper with smoke, we can see how none of it escapes through the toebox but finds a way through the tongue.
Asics gel-nimbus 23 platinum grey white women running sports shoes 1012b132-020 (on the right) proved to be much better ventilated
This is the reason why we lowered the shoe's breathability score to only 3 out of 5. But the good news is that very few tennis shoes get more than 3 due to reinforced uppers.
Even when we hovered the shoe's half-cut upper over the light, we couldn't see a single pore. The material is dense throughout.
The light didn't even shine through those ventilation holes in the toebox! Looking at them up close through our microscope revealed that there is a tightly woven mesh layer underneath. It also stands in the way of letting the air escape so freely.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 3 |
Average | 3.1 |
Durability
Toebox durability
From the beginning, our hopes were set high for the Challenger 14's upper durability. With that dense synthetic layer it is supposed to be tough, right?
zapatillas de running ASICS pronador talla 44.5.
With the speed set to 5K RPM, we held the tool's sandpaper tip against the shoe's toebox for 12 seconds. And the result was far from encouraging.
The tool drilled right through the synthetic layer, damaging the lining beneath it too. For that reason, we couldn't rate the shoe's toebox durability higher than 3 out of 5.
While there is a toe drag guard on this ASICS shoe, it is not as substantial as in the brand's other models. Even though it offers protection, it won't help much when you happen to brush a non-guarded area of the upper against the court.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 3 |
Average | 4.1 |
Heel padding durability
Of course, we cannot expect stellar durability from a budget-friendly model. But we must also be open about the shoe's shortcomings.
The Challenger's heel collar padding was the next part touched by our demanding Dremel. The delicate mesh gave in rather quickly as it took a mere 4 seconds to tear it apart.
On a 1-5 scale, where 1 is the least abrasion-resistant, we gave it the lowest score.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 1 |
Average | 3.3 |
Outsole hardness
Seeing the pitfalls of the upper, we were more cautious about the shoe's outsole durability. But luckily, it performed rather well in our lab tests.
First of all, its rubber compound is adequately hard, showing 86.5 HA on our durometer. This is just as hard as in the more expensive tennis shoes. Softer rubbers tend to wear out way faster on the hard court.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 86.5 HC |
Average | 85.8 HC |
Outsole durability
Going all out, we amped up the Dremel speed to 10K RPM and held its sandpaper tip against the shoe's outsole for 22 seconds.
The shoe's AHAR PLUS rubber held up fabulously, just like we would expect from ASICS' top-tier outsole. It seems as though the Dremel only brushed the dust off the shoe as our tread gauge showed a minuscule dent of 0.4 mm.
Smaller than average, it reassured us of the Challenger 14's shelf life.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 0.4 mm |
Average | 0.7 mm |
Outsole thickness
Even though there is no durability warranty for this ASICS shoe, its resistance to abrasion and the amount of rubber look promising enough to us.
Based on our caliper measurements, the outsole of the Challenger is 4.1 mm thick. That's a solid slab of rubber to wear through!
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 4.1 mm |
Average | 4.1 mm |
Weight
The DYNAWING setup on the sides of the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 makes the shoe seem heavier than it is. We felt quite nimble moving all over the court in this tennis shoe.
Placing it on the scale, we got 12.5 oz (354g) in a men's US size 9. That's even lighter than average! Especially for a shoe with such pronounced stability features.
For context, ASICS' step-up stability shoe (ASICS GEL-Lyte III Piedmont Grey) comes in at 13.8 oz (392g).
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 12.49 oz (354g) |
Average | 12.84 oz (364g) |
Cushioning
Heel stack
Worrying about impact protection is absolutely unnecessary with the ASICS Gel Challenger 14. It has more cushioning than 60% of our lab-tested tennis shoes!
Measuring the shoe's heel stack, we got 30.4 mm. Same as the Adidas Barricade 13 (30.2 mm).
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 30.4 mm |
Average | 29.3 mm |
Forefoot stack
There is also a generous amount of forefoot cushioning in the Challenger 14. It's got a good level of responsiveness for split steps and explosive launches.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 20.8 mm |
Average | 19.7 mm |
Drop
But we should note that this ASICS shoe doesn't feel detached from the ground either. It has a moderately steep incline between the heel and the toes. At 9.6 mm, it makes the heel only slightly elevated allowing for a cushioned yet stable experience.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 9.6 mm |
Average | 9.7 mm |
Midsole softness
A major portion of the shoe's midsole is made of a single-density foam. ASICS doesn't specify what kind of foam that is but we measured its softness at 31.3 HA. That's a moderately firm compound which is typical for tennis shoes.
Under the heel, the Challenger 14 features a rearfoot GEL unit. Wonderfully squishy, it Butys out the firmer carrier foam by adding a bit of bounce.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 31.3 HA |
Average | 29.2 HA |
ASICS GT 2000 8 Lite Show Pure Silver Black Pure Silver | Insole thickness
Finishing up the shoe's cushioning setup is a fairly well-padded insole. Based on our caliper, it is 5.2 mm thick which is standard for tennis footwear.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 5.2 mm |
Average | 5.3 mm |
Stability
Lateral stability test
The DYNAWING stability system has a slightly different configuration in the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 than in the brand's top stability shoe, the ASICS GEL-Lyte III Piedmont Grey. Asics Zapatillas Gel-Resolution 7.
The shoe allowed us to forget about potential ankle rolls and focus on the game wholeheartedly.
Lateral stability test: Кроссовки кроссы asics
Even though the Resolution 9 has more rearfoot reinforcement, you can see how both ASICS shoes are taking good care of the arch and ankle support.
zapatillas de running ASICS pronador maratón negras
Torsional rigidity
The brand's DYNAWALL system creates such a strong midfoot hold that we couldn't even twist it one bit! The video below shows our struggles.
Based on this manual test, we rated the shoe's torsional rigidity with the highest possible score - 5 out of 5. It is the same level of stiffness as we observed in the Resolution 9.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 5 |
Average | 4.2 |
asics gel nimbus 22 grey lime zest carrier greylime zest running shoessneakers
The Gel Challenger 14 also made sure that there was enough stiffness and structure in its heel counter. Playing in this ASICS shoe, we never got a hint of heel slippage or undue ankle play.
Assessing its stiffness on a 1-5 scale, we gave it nearly the highest - 4 out of 5.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 4 |
Average | 3.9 |
Asics Men EX89 Whie Genry Purple 1201A476-102
Interestingly enough, the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 managed to achieve a very high level of stability without going for a super wide platform.
Measuring the widest part of the forefoot, we got 110.6 mm on our caliper. That's no different from the average across tennis shoes. The lateral outrigger is quite supple in this ASICS shoe.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 110.6 mm |
Average | 111.7 mm |
ASICS Lengüeta partida
The same can be said about the shoe's heel width. The distance between its widest points here is 88.5 mm. Not among the widest on our roster for sure.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 88.5 mm |
Average | 89.7 mm |
Flexibility
Stiffness
The shoe's DYNAWALL support ends near the forefoot, creating a good breaking point for the foot to bend at the metatarsal joints.
To give you an idea of how the Gel Challenger 14 measures against other tennis shoes, we used our in-house flexibility test. We bent the shoe to a 90-degree angle with the help of a force gauge and the tool showed that it took only 23.2N. That's a whole 33% less than it takes on average!
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 23.2N |
Average | 30.1N |
Grip / Traction
What's amazing about the Challenger 14 is that you get to enjoy the highest quality of grip but for $50 less! We found that the traction pattern on this ASICS shoe is 100% identical to that of the ASICS GEL-Lyte III Piedmont Grey!
The shoe's outsole offered a fantastic Buty of grip and give, providing great stopping power when we needed it but letting us slide around the court just as freely.
Size and fit
Toebox width at the widest part
The fit of the ASICS Gel Challenger 14 can be described as perfectly medium. Having medium-width feet ourselves, we felt like the shoe's toebox was fine-tuned to our footshape.
Our subjective experience was also confirmed by our caliper measurements. In the widest part of the forefoot, the tool returned 101.1 mm which is an average reading for a tennis shoe.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 101.1 mm |
Average | 101.2 mm |
womens asics solution speed ff tokyo red wmns marathon running shoessneakers
There is also no drastic tapering of the shoe towards the toes. At the big to mark, we measured the upper's width at 76.8 mm. Right about the same as the average.
But if you are someone with wide feet, you will probably be left wishing for more in-shoe space. In that case, we recommend looking into the Кроссовки кроссы asics which is available in wide options.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 76.8 mm |
Average | 76.8 mm |
asics novablast womens running shoes white haze
Given its price point, the ASICS Challenger 14 is a simple shoe. It doesn't feature extra add-ons such as tongue gussets. So there is a small risk of tongue shifting in this model but nothing too critical.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | None |
Comfort
Tongue padding
On the inside, this ASICS shoe is all about padding and comfort. It packs lots of foam around the collar as well as in the tongue.
The tongue in particular is 10.5 mm thick! That's notably thicker than average, by a few millimeters. So don't mind the $100 price tag - ASICS made sure that you get the cushiest experience inside the shoe.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | 10.5 mm |
Average | 7.8 mm |
Heel tab
There are no heel tabs to hold onto when putting on the ASICS Gel Challenger 14. But the fact that its tongue is not gusseted really helps to keep the shoe's yuzu wide and slide into it quickly.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | None |
Removable insole
If you happen to use custom orthotics or a different kind of insert, the shoe's stock insole is easily removable and can be swapped just like that.
Asics Gel Challenger 14 | Yes |