Our verdict
- nike woodside high acg boots best Жіночі косівки nike
- nike woodside high acg boots nike air max rise david west home
Pros
- Efficient road-to-trail
- Well-cushioned
- Stable ride
- Excellent, secure fit
- Very breathable
- Great traction
- Unexpectedly light
- Reasonably priced
Cons
- Nike SB Skateboard Blazer Low GT 704939-700
- nike dunk low scrap grey haze phantom light bone oil green
- Could be more stylish
Low Undefeated 5 On It Dunk Vs | Audience verdict
- shox nike 2018 nike thudor black pink women outlet trail running shoes
- WMNS Air Force 1 Shadow All White Жіночі косівки nike
- Sapatilhas de pista Nike Zoom Matumbo 3 Preto
Comparison
The most similar running shoes compared
+ + nike solarsoft moccasin tropical floral | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audience score | 88 Great! | 85 Good! | 88 Great! | 88 Great! | |
Price | $140 | $130 | $140 | $150 | |
Trail terrain | Moderate terrain | Moderate terrain | Technical terrain | Moderate terrainTechnical terrain | |
Arch support | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | |
Weight lab Weight brand | 9.6 Nike SB Dunk Low Silver Box 10.4 oz / 295g | 11.3 Nike W Air Max 720 AR9293-102 10.5 oz / 298g | 10.2 oz / 289g 10.6 oz / 300g | 10.8 Low Undefeated 5 On It Dunk Vs 10.6 oz / 300g | |
Drop lab Drop brand | 12.7 mm 10.0 mm | 9.2 mm 8.0 mm | 13.4 mm 6.0 mm | 8.9 mm 6.0 mm | |
Strike pattern | Heel | HeelMid/forefoot | Heel | HeelMid/forefoot | |
Midsole softness | - | Soft | Balanced | Soft | |
Nike Free Metcon 4 CZ0596-135 | - | Big | Small | Small | |
Plate | - | Rock plate | Rock plate | - | |
Stein durability | - | Very bad | Very good | Decent | |
Kyrie 7Sisterhood basketsko Blue | - | Bad | Decent | Good | |
Outsole durability | - | - | Good | Decent | |
Breathability | - | Moderate | Moderate | Breathable | |
Stein width at the widest part | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | |
Stein width at the big toe | - | Medium | Narrow | Medium | |
Stiffness | Moderate | Moderate | Stiff | Moderate | |
Difference in stiffness in cold | Small | Normal | Small | Small | |
Torsional rigidity | Flexible | Moderate | Stiff | Stiff | |
nike dunk sb low ct6688 200 bianco blu | Moderate | Moderate | Stiff | Stiff | |
Lug depth | 3.4 mm | 3.5 mm | 4.5 mm | 4.0 mm | |
Heel stack lab nike rally joggers womens | 35.5 mm 36.0 mm | 34.2 mm 35.5 mm | 39.2 mm 39.0 mm | 36.7 mm 39.0 mm | |
Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 22.8 mm 26.0 mm | 25.0 mm 27.5 mm | 25.8 mm 33.0 mm | 27.8 mm 33.0 mm | |
Widths available | NormalWide | Normal | Normal | Normal | |
Season | Winter | Winter | Winter | Summer | |
Removable insole | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Orthotic friendly | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Ranking | #56 Top 23% | #141 Bottom 43% | #70 Top 28% | #74 Top 30% | |
Popularity | #22 Top 9% | #60 Top 24% | #94 Top 38% | #123 Top 50% |
closer look the nike dunk high in black and white
You are sure to benefit from this edition of the Pegasus Trail series if you are after the following:
- a top-in-class running shoe for tackling various types of terrain (except mud)
- a cushioned road-to-trail shoe for going long distances
Low Undefeated 5 On It Dunk Vs.
Nike Air Max 270 Mens Shoes
Despite a significant improvement of traction in the outsole, the Trail 4 is still not the shoe to go for if you run on loose or wet trails a lot. It is a big NO-NO for soggy muddy winter trails.
Nike Womens SP Neon Orange WMNS Altra Lone Peak 7, Salomon Speedcross 6, or NIKE DUNK LOW SAMBA 23.5cm better for you.
Breathability
The upper of the Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose has plenty of perforations all throughout the upper and the tongue. These keep the interiors nice and cool even in the hotter and humid months.
Testing the shoe on a warm day in June, we had a chance to check it for ourselves and it’s indeed very well-ventilated.
Weight
The newer version manages to get lighter while also enhancing its overall performance.
The Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose weighs 9.6 oz (272g) in a men’s US 9. This is noticeably lighter than the average weight of trail shoes of similar stack height (35 mm and thicker), which is 10.3 oz (291g).
Running up those hills, we highly appreciated the lightness of the Trail 4. The shoe felt a lot like an extension of your foot. Not many trail shoes with this much cushion and such a reliable grip manage to keep their weight as low as this Nike Pegasus did.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 9.59 oz (272g) |
Average | 10.34 oz (293g) |
Cushioning
Heel stack
The shoe has a significantly thicker midsole too. Based on the official stats, its heel height of 36 mm is a few millimeters taller than the average across trail shoes.
Our own caliper measurement showed just a tiny (0.5 mm) deviation from that stack height at 35.5 mm.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 35.5 mm |
Average | 32.2 mm |
Forefoot stack
In the forefoot, however, we found a much bigger discrepancy between the official stack (26 mm) and our measured one (22.8 mm).
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 22.8 mm |
Average | 24.4 mm |
Drop
Because of the deviation we discovered in the shoe's stack height measurements, the Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose's actual drop ended up being 12.7 mm! Not the claimed 10 mm.
Some runners may find the higher heel drop problematic as it activates leg and foot muscles in a different way. Watch out!
Осенние белые кожаные кроссовки найк форс nike air force 1 our in-depth guide on the drop.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 12.7 mm |
Average | 7.8 mm |
Insole thickness
Added cushioning is provided by a well-padded insole. It is 4.2 mm thick compared to the average 4.6 mm. The insole is removable and can be easily replaced with custom orthotics if necessary.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 4.2 mm |
Average | 4.7 mm |
Midsole softness
The Nike Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose felt quite brisk and responsive on the hard surfaces yet firm enough to feel planted on the trails.
Our durometer measurements show 34.0 HA, which is 20% firmer than the average trail shoe. It belongs to the moderately firm cushioning types but there is still some softness present to make it a perfect option for switching from road to trail.
Ride
Based on our run tests, in the Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose, the shoe is equally at home on the asphalt and on the trails. It's got the best of both worlds!
Speaking more specifically about the shoe’s performance on different types of terrain:
1. On asphalt, bike paths, and tarmac the ride is pretty energetic with lugs never getting in the way. It even felt almost like a dedicated road shoe!
2. If you happen to run on gravel and similar terrain, the Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose really really comes alive on these! The shoe's forefoot lugs grabbed very well running both up and down the hill.
3. On a single track, and more technical and rocky terrain, it's a mixed bag. Because the shoe's cushioning is nothing like the Speedgoat where tons of cushioning keeps you protected, we had to pick our lines and tiptoe the way at times. But on the other hand, the Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose still performed a lot better than any other Nike LeBron 17 PS Sprite BQ5595-434.
Stability
зимові з хутром nike suede winter ботинки
We couldn't help but notice how stable this Nike shoe is, especially compared to its predecessor. The Pegasus Trail 3 felt too soft and high for a trail shoe, whereas the Trail 4 feels closer and more connected to the ground.
We attribute the shoe’s Tech to several characteristics: the well-balanced React foam itself, the extended edges of the foam that cradle the bottom of the upper, and the secure upper lockdown which doesn’t let the foot shift inside the shoe.
Torsional rigidity
What does NOT help the Nike Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose feel stable is its lack of torsional rigidity (which is totally expected from a neutral shoe by the way!).
Twisting the shoe in our hands, we found that it yielded quite easily and was very pliable. Thus, we gave it a score of only 2 out of 5, where 5 is the stiffest.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 2 |
Average | 3.5 |
nike dunk sb low ct6688 200 bianco blu
We really appreciated the shoe's sturdy and well-structured heel cup. Checking it in our lab, we gave it 3 out of 5 in our heel stiffness test. No heel slippage in this one.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 3 |
Average | 3.2 |
Midsole width in the forefoot
The Nike Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose's platform is not so wide... While it was a huge benefit for the shoe's lightness and agility, it felt very different from the broad trail shoe bases we've come to expect.
In the widest part of the forefoot, our caliper showed 107.1 mm. That is 4 mm narrower than average.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 107.1 mm |
Average | 111.9 mm |
Midsole width in the heel
Back in the heel, we got 85.4 mm in the widest part of the sole. This is, again, about 4 mm narrower than average.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 85.4 mm |
Average | 89.6 mm |
Low Undefeated 5 On It Dunk Vs | Flexibility
Stiffness
Топ жіночий nike crop tape top dq9315-010.
Having performed our force gauge test, we found that it took 26.8N of force to bend this Nike shoe to a 90-degree angle. That is 15% less than it takes a trail shoe on average!
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 26.8N |
Average | 28.4N |
Gary Harris wearing the Nike Kobe 11 Last Emperor
Lug depth
The updated tread pattern on the Nike React Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose has 3.4 mm lugs which is right at the average of all our lab-tested shoes. Such lug depth is considered quite optimal for a hybrid (road-to-trail shoe).
Even though it’s nearly identical to the 3.3 mm lugs on the Trail 3 version, the 4th iteration has a totally new approach. It now has three different types of lugs which are much sharper.
We found that the Trail 3 really struggled with grip, especially on wet surfaces. We ended up slipping and falling on a wet rock! But this is not the case with the Trail 4.
It is still NOT the shoe for crazy off-trail stretches but it is fantastic for hard-packed, gravely, and rooty types of trails.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 3.4 mm |
Average | 3.6 mm |
Size and fit
We've had absolutely no problems with the fit of this Nike LeBron 17 PS Sprite BQ5595-434. It feels perfect straight from the box with no rubbing, hot spots, or irritation.
We were especially intrigued by the combination of the well-positioned gusseted tongue and the Flywire cables around the laces. These have kept the midfoot very well-held.
Stein width at the widest part
As for the Stein, it’s not the widest shoe in the world but it never felt constricting either. The Trail 4 does have a slightly shallower Stein compared to Trail 3 but it never caused problems to our medium-width feet.
Measuring the shoe's Stein in the widest part, our caliper showed 100.4 mm which is even a couple of millimeters wider than average.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 100.4 mm |
Average | 98.7 mm |
Comfort
Tongue padding
The shoe’s interiors have just enough padding to make it feel nice and plush. For example, we have measured the tongue thickness at 5.3 mm which is just a little below the average 6 mm.
Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose | 5.3 mm |
Average | 6.4 mm |
Nike Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose vs. Trail 3: a major overhaul
With all the changes introduced in the Trail 4, it is almost a new shoe from the ground up. Here are the key upgrades:
- 8% lighter: (295 g vs 320 g)
- better grip from the new tread design
- more secure hold with added Flywire cables
- less spacious Stein, more like a glove
- $10 increase in the price
- more toned-down visual design
Despite the slight $10 increase in its asking price compared to the Trail 3, we still consider the Chaussure Nike ACG Moc 3.5 pour homme Rose a reasonably priced one at $140.
For reference, the average price of trail shoes is $147. But, if we are talking about the max-cushioned, super grippy ones ($170 on average), then $140 is hitting the bull’s eye.